• Login
    View Item 
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Latent class evaluation of the performance of serological tests for exposure to Brucella spp. in cattle, sheep, and goats in Tanzania

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (1.503Mb)
    Date
    2021-08-24
    Author
    Bodenham, Rebecca
    Mazeri, Stella
    Cleaveland, Sarah
    Crump, John
    Fasina, Folorunso
    Glanville, William
    Haydon, Daniel
    Kazwala, Rudovick
    Kibona, Tito
    Maro, Venance
    Maze, Michael
    Mmbaga, Blandina
    Mtui-Malamsha, Niwael
    Shirima, Gabriel
    Swai, Emanuel
    Thomas, Kate
    deC Bronsvoort, Barend
    Halliday, Jo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Brucellosis is a neglected zoonosis endemic in many countries, including regions of sub-Saharan Africa. Evaluated diagnostic tools for the detection of exposure to Brucella spp. are important for disease surveillance and guiding prevention and control activities. Methods and findings Bayesian latent class analysis was used to evaluate performance of the Rose Bengal plate test (RBT) and a competitive ELISA (cELISA) in detecting Brucella spp. exposure at the individual animal-level for cattle, sheep, and goats in Tanzania. Median posterior estimates of RBT sensitivity were: 0.779 (95% Bayesian credibility interval (BCI): 0.570–0.894), 0.893 (0.636–0.989), and 0.807 (0.575–0.966), and for cELISA were: 0.623 (0.443–0.790), 0.409 (0.241–0.644), and 0.561 (0.376–0.713), for cattle, sheep, and goats, respectively. Sensitivity BCIs were wide, with the widest for cELISA in sheep. RBT and cELISA median posterior estimates of specificity were high across species models: RBT ranged between 0.989 (0.980–0.998) and 0.995 (0.985–0.999), and cELISA between 0.984 (0.974–0.995) and 0.996 (0.988–1). Each species model generated seroprevalence estimates for two livestock subpopulations, pastoralist and non-pastoralist. Pastoralist seroprevalence estimates were: 0.063 (0.045–0.090), 0.033 (0.018–0.049), and 0.051 (0.034–0.076), for cattle, sheep, and goats, respectively. Non-pastoralist seroprevalence estimates were below 0.01 for all species models. Series and parallel diagnostic approaches were evaluated. Parallel outperformed a series approach. Median posterior estimates for parallel testing were ≥0.920 (0.760–0.986) for sensitivity and ≥0.973 (0.955–0.992) for specificity, for all species models. Conclusions Our findings indicate that Brucella spp. surveillance in Tanzania using RBT and cELISA in parallel at the animal-level would give high test performance. There is a need to evaluate strategies for implementing parallel testing at the herd- and flock-level. Our findings can assist in generating robust Brucella spp. exposure estimates for livestock in Tanzania and wider sub-Saharan Africa. The adoption of locally evaluated robust diagnostic tests in setting-specific surveillance is an important step towards brucellosis prevention and control.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009630
    https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2043
    Collections
    • Research Articles [LISBE]

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV