Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBelau, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorBoenecke, Juliane
dc.contributor.authorStröbele, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorHimmel, Mirko
dc.contributor.authorDretvić, Daria
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Ummul-Khair
dc.contributor.authorKreppel, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorSauli, Elingarami
dc.contributor.authorBrinkel, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorClemen, Ulfia
dc.contributor.authorClemen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorStreit, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorMay, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, Amena
dc.contributor.authorReintjes, Ralf
dc.contributor.authorBecher, Heiko
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-04T10:58:37Z
dc.date.available2025-04-04T10:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-28
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012946
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2997
dc.descriptionThis research article was published by PLOS Negleted Tropical Diseases Volume 19,2025en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Dengue fever is one of the world’s most important re-emerging but neglected infectious diseases. We aimed to develop and evaluate an integrated risk assessment framework to enhance early detection and risk assessment of potential dengue outbreaks in settings with limited routine surveillance and diagnostic capacity. Methods Our risk assessment framework utilizes the combination of various methodological components: We first focused on (I) identifying relevant clinical signals based on a case definition for suspected dengue, (II) refining the signal for potential dengue diagnosis using contextual data, and (III) determining the public health risk associated with a verified dengue signal across various hazard, exposure, and contextual indicators. We then evaluated our framework using (i) historical clinical signals with syndromic and laboratory-confirmed disease information derived from WHO’s Epidemic Intelligence from Open Sources (EIOS) technology using decision tree analyses, and (ii) historical dengue outbreak data from Tanzania at the regional level from 2019 (6,795 confirmed cases) using negative binomial regression analyses adjusted for month and region. Finally, we evaluated a test signal across all steps of our integrated framework to demonstrate the implementation of our multi-method approach. Results The result of the suspected case refinement algorithm for clinically defined syndromic cases was consistent with the laboratory-confirmed diagnosis (dengue yes or no). Regression between confirmed dengue fever cases in 2019 as the dependent variable and a site-specific public health risk score as the independent variable showed strong evidence of an increase in dengue fever cases with higher site-specific risk (rate ratio = 2.51 (95% CI = [1.76, 3.58])). Conclusions The framework can be used to rapidly determine the public health risk of dengue outbreaks, which is useful for planning and prioritizing interventions or for epidemic preparedness. It further allows for flexibility in its adaptation to target diseases and geographical contexts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.titleIntegrated rapid risk assessment for dengue fever in settings with limited diagnostic capacity and uncertain exposure: Development of a methodological framework for Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record