dc.contributor.author | Komakech, Hans | |
dc.contributor.author | Moyo, Francis | |
dc.contributor.author | Roda, Oscar | |
dc.contributor.author | Machunda, Revocatus | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Kyla | |
dc.contributor.author | Gautam, Om | |
dc.contributor.author | Cairncross, Sandy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-11T07:25:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-11T07:25:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-10 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183328 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2236 | |
dc.description | A project report submitted in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, volume 16(18), | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6.2 sets an ambitious target of leaving no-one without
adequate and equitable sanitation by 2030. The key concern is the lack of local human and financial
capital to fund the collection of reliable information to monitor progress towards the goal. As a
result, national and local records may be telling a different story of the proportion of safely managed
sanitation that counts towards achieving the SDG. This paper unveils such inconsistency in sanitation
data generated by urban authorities and proposes a simple approach for collecting reliable and
verifiable information on access to safely managed sanitation. The paper is based on a study conducted
in Babati Town Council in Tanzania. Using a smartphone-based survey tool, city health officers were
trained to map 17,383 housing units in the town. A housing unit may comprise of two or more
households. The findings show that 5% practice open defecation, while 82% of the housing units
have some form of sanitation. Despite the extensive coverage, only 31% of the fecal sludge generated
is safely contained, while 64% is not. This study demonstrates the possibility of using simple survey
tools to collect reliable data for monitoring progress towards safely managed sanitation in the towns
of global South | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_US |
dc.subject | small towns | en_US |
dc.subject | mapping | en_US |
dc.subject | urban sanitation | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG | en_US |
dc.title | What proportion counts? Disaggregating access to safely managed sanitation in an emerging town in Tanzania | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |