Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMlalama, Killian
dc.contributor.authorMatemu, Athanasia
dc.contributor.authorKosia, Efraim
dc.contributor.authorCanavan, Chelsey
dc.contributor.authorBellows, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorBlakstad, Mia
dc.contributor.authorNoor, , Ramadhani
dc.contributor.authorKinabo, Joyce
dc.contributor.authorFawzi, Wafaie
dc.contributor.authorMasanja, Honorati
dc.contributor.authorMosha, Dominic
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-27T08:47:09Z
dc.date.available2023-09-27T08:47:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-20
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000531
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2074
dc.descriptionThis research article was published in the PLOS Global Public Health, September 20, 2022en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is growing evidence that home vegetable gardening interventions improve food security and nutrition outcomes at the family level. Sustainability of many of these community interventions remain a challenge. This study assessed factors influencing the sustainability of homestead vegetable production intervention in Rufiji district, Tanzania, one year after the cessation of external support. This was a community based cross-sectional study using both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. A total of 247 randomly selected women from households who participated in the homestead vegetable intervention were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The study held four focus group discussions with women from households that participated in the intervention, and four In-Depth interviews with two extension workers, one community health worker, and one agriculture district officer. Multiple logistic regression for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data was conducted. About 20.24% (50/247) of households sustained homestead vegetable production for one year after the intervention phased out. Shortage of seeds (adjusted odds ratio = 0.65: CI = 0.46–0.93, p-value 0.018) and either manure or fertilizers (adjusted odds ratio = 1.62: CI = 1.04–2.46, p-value 0.031) were significant factors influencing the sustainability of homesteads vegetable production. In the Focus Group discussions (FGDs) and In-Depth Interview (IDIs), all participating women and extension workers reported high cost of water, destruction from free-grazing animals, agriculture pests and diseases, poor soil fertility, shortage of seeds, and lack of capital affected homestead vegetable production sustainability. Existing individual, community, and system challenges influence the sustainability of external-funded agriculture and nutrition interventions. The study findings underscore the importance of community authorities, scientists, and policymakers in having a well-thought sustainability plan in all promising external-funded interventions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS Global Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.titleFactors influencing the sustainability of homestead vegetable production intervention in Rufiji, Tanzania: A cross-sectional mixed methods studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record