Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMbelele, Peter M
dc.contributor.authorMpolya, Emmanuel A
dc.contributor.authorSauli, Elingarami
dc.contributor.authorMtafya, Bariki
dc.contributor.authorNtinginya, Nyanda E
dc.contributor.authorAddo, Kennedy K
dc.contributor.authorKreppel, Katharina
dc.contributor.authorMfinanga, Sayoki
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Patrick P J
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Stephen H
dc.contributor.authorHeysell, Scott K
dc.contributor.authorSabiiti, Wilber
dc.contributor.authorMpagama, Stellah G
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T10:03:59Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T10:03:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-03
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02927-20
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/1143
dc.descriptionThis research article published by the American Society for Microbiology, 2021en_US
dc.description.abstractRifampicin or multidrug-resistant-tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) treatment has largely transitioned to regimens free of the injectable aminoglycoside component despite the drug class' purported bactericidal activity early in treatment. We tested whether () killing rates measured by molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA) in sputa correlate with composition of the RR/MDR-TB regimen. Serial sputa were collected from patients with RR/MDR- and drug-sensitive TB at day 0, 3, 7, 14, and then monthly for 4 months of anti-TB treatment. TB-MBLA was used to quantify viable 16S rRNA in sputum for estimation of colony-forming-unit per mL (eCFU/mL). killing rates were compared among regimens using nonlinear-mixed-effects modelling of repeated measures. Thirty-seven patients produced 296 serial sputa: 13 patients received an injectable-containing but bedaquiline-free reference regimen, 9 received an injectable and bedaquiline-containing regimen, 8 received an all-oral bedaquiline-based regimen, and 7 patients were treated for drug-sensitive TB with conventional rifampin/isoniazid/pyrazinamide/ethambutol (RHZE). Compared to the adjusted killing of -0.17 (95% CI; -0.23 to -0.12) for the injectable-containing but bedaquiline-free reference regimen, the killing rates were -0.62 (95% CI; -1.05 to -0.20) log eCFU/mL for the injectable and bedaquiline-containing regimen (p = 0.019), -0.35 (95% CI; -0.65 to -0.13) log eCFU/mL for the all-oral bedaquiline-based regimen (p = 0.054), and -0.29 (95% CI; -0.78 to +0.22) log eCFU/mL for RHZE (p = 0.332). killing rates from sputa were higher among patients who received bedaquiline but were further improved with the addition of an injectable aminoglycoside.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMDR-TB treatment regimensen_US
dc.subjectMolecular bacterial load assayen_US
dc.subjectMultidrug-resistant TBen_US
dc.subjectMycobactericidal effectsen_US
dc.subjectMycobacterium tuberculosisen_US
dc.subjectAll-oral bedaquiline regimenen_US
dc.subjectInjectable aminoglycoside regimenen_US
dc.titleMycobactericidal effect of different regimens measured by molecular bacterial load assay among people treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Tanzania.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record