• Login
    View Item 
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Materials, Energy, Water and Environmental Sciences
    • Research Articles
    • View Item
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Materials, Energy, Water and Environmental Sciences
    • Research Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Neither modern nor traditional: Farmer-led irrigation development in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract (113.5Kb)
    Date
    2019-04
    Author
    de Bont, Chris
    Komakech, Hans
    Veldwisch, Gert Jan
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The debate around what kind of irrigation, large- or small-scale, modern or traditional, best contributes to food security and rural development continues to shape irrigation policies and development in the Global South. In Tanzania, the irrigation categories of ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ are dominating irrigation policies and are shaping interventions. In this paper, we explore what these concepts really entail in the Tanzanian context and how they relate to a case of farmer-led groundwater irrigation development in Kahe ward, Kilimanjaro Region. For our analysis, we rely on three months of qualitative fieldwork in 2016, a household questionnaire, secondary data such as policy documents and the results of a mapping exercise in 2014–2015. In the early 2000s, smallholders in Kahe started developing groundwater. This has led to a new, differentiated landscape in which different forms of agricultural production co-exist. The same set of groundwater irrigation technologies has facilitated the emergence of different classes of farmers, ranging from those engaging with subsistence farming to those doing capitalist farming. The level of inputs and integration with markets vary, as does crop choice. As such, some farms emulate the ‘modern’ ideal of commercial farming promoted by the government, while others do not, or to a lesser extent. We also find that national policy discourses on irrigation are not necessarily repeated at the local level, where interventions are strongly driven by prioritization based on conflict and funding. We conclude that the policy concepts of traditional and modern irrigation do not do justice to the complexity of actual irrigation development in the Kahe case, and obfuscate its contribution to rural development and food security. We argue that a single irrigation technology does not lead to a single agricultural mode of production, and that irrigation policies and interventions should take into account the differentiation among irrigators.
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.018
    http://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/123456789/644
    Collections
    • Research Articles

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV