Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKisekelwa, Tchalondawa
dc.contributor.authorAlimasi, Wilondja
dc.contributor.authorMazambi, Lutete
dc.contributor.authorMwaijengo, Grite
dc.contributor.authorHyangya, Lwikitcha
dc.contributor.authorMuzungu, Heri
dc.contributor.authorJoyeuse, Mudagi
dc.contributor.authorLubala, Amani
dc.contributor.authorKubota, Musombwa
dc.contributor.authorWüest, Alfred
dc.contributor.authorMuvundja, Amisi
dc.contributor.authorMasilya, Mulungula
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T08:10:49Z
dc.date.available2023-10-12T08:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/d15091014
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2290
dc.descriptionThis research article was published in Diversity Journal, Volume 15, 2023.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn total, 28 of the 29 fish species reported from the Lake Kivu basin occur in the littoral zone of the lake, but information about their structure, occurrence, and the habitats affecting their distribution is largely lacking. The lake’s inshore area is poorly heterogenous, with rock and macrophyte habitats representing the major habitats. The lack of heterogeneity in the habitats is probably an important factor influencing species richness, abundance, and the association between the species and habitats. We evaluated the fish diversity, abundance, and habitat parameters across 14 sites representing the major habitats of the lake, using data collected between April 2018 and October 2019. We calculated Hull and Jaccard indices and applied uni- and multivariate statistical approaches to the collected data. We identified 18 fish species in the lake. In the north, 17 species were found, with high abundance in rocky sites but low abundance in sandy habitats. In the south, 15 species were reported. We identified 12 species in the Ishungu Basin where the site with rock substrate had high abundance and 13 species in the Bukavu Basin with weak species richness and low abundance across degraded sites. Lamprichthys tanganicanus, a non-native species, was abundant in rocky (north) and macrophyte sites (south). Sand, rock, conductivity, depth, dissolved oxygen, and water transparency were significant parameters that could explain the fish distribution in the north while dissolved oxygen, vegetation cover, depth, and conductivity were significant in the south. A monitoring programme of the fish fauna in Lake Kivu is needed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectAltered sitesen_US
dc.subjectEcological predictorsen_US
dc.subjectFish abundanceen_US
dc.subjectFish communityen_US
dc.subjectHaplochromis = indigenousen_US
dc.subjectLamprichthys tanganicanus = non-indigenousen_US
dc.subjectSpecies richnessen_US
dc.subjectUnaltered sitesen_US
dc.titleFish Diversity in Relation to Littoral Habitats in Three Basins of Lake Kivu (East Africa)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record