Browsing by Author "Mwanga, Rehema"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A household randomized-control trial of insecticide-treated screening for malaria control in unimproved houses in Tanzania
    (Springer Nature, 2025-06-08) Odufuwa, Olukayode; Moore, Sarah Jane; Mboma, Zawadi; Mwanga, Rehema; Matwewe, Fatuma; Hofer, Lorenz; Moore, Jason; Nguyen, Hien; Bosselmann, Rune; Skovmand, Ole; Stevenson,Jennifer; Muganga, Joseph; Bradley, John
    Background Installing insecticidal netting on open eaves, windows, and holes in walls of unimproved houses is a potential malaria control tool. It prevents mosquito house-entry, induces lethal and sub-lethal effects on malaria vectors, and may reduce malaria transmission. Therefore, a household epidemiological trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of insecticide- treated screening (ITS) on malaria infection and indoor vectors in Tanzania. Methods In Chalinze district, Tanzania, 421 households were randomized into two arms. In June-July 2021, one group of households’ houses was fitted with ITS (incorporated with deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide) on eaves, windows, and wall holes, while the second group did not receive screening. After installation, consenting household members (aged ≥ 6 months) were tested for malaria infection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction after the long rainy season (June/July 2022, primary outcome) and the short rainy season (January/February 2022, secondary outcome). Secondary outcomes included indoor total mosquito per trap/night (June–July 2022), adverse effects after one month of ITS installation (August 2021), and chemical bioavailability and retention of ITS samples after one year of field use (June/July 2022). At the end of the trial, the control group received ITS. Results Malaria prevalence among residents in the ITS arm was 19.9% (50/251) and 28.3% (65/230) in the control arm after the long rains, however, this difference was not significant [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (95% CI 0.35–1.28), p = 0.227]. Similarly, no protection was seen for ITS after the short rains, [OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.68–2.38), p = 0.452]. However, school-age children in the ITS arm had lower malaria after the long rains [OR 0.11 (95% CI 0.02–0.73), p = 0.022]. No serious adverse effects were reported. The mean number of female Anopheles mosquitoes caught per trap/night was not significantly different between arms [1.7 vs 2.4, crude relative risk: 0.71 (95% CI 0.16–3.09), p = 0.650]. ITS showed reduced chemical bioavailability and retention post-field use. The trial reported high household refusals (17–30%) in both arms in both surveys. Conclusion The trial was inconclusive because households’ refusal resulted in low power. A large cluster randomized trial of the intervention, preferably with screens treated with longer-lasting insecticides installed in houses, is needed. Trial registry: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05125133) on October 2021 Keywords Insecticide-treated screening, ITS, Insecticide-treated nets, ITNs, Eave nets, Malaria prevalence, Mosquitoes, Trial, House modification, Tanzania
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Contrasting vector competence of three main East African Anopheles malaria vector mosquitoes for Plasmodium falciparum
    (Scientific reports, 2025-01-17) Kweyamba, Prisca; Hofer, Lorenz; Kibondo, Ummi; Mwanga, Rehema; Sayi, Rajabu; Matwewe, Fatuma; Lwetoijera, Dickson; Tambwe, Mgeni; Moore, Sarah
    There are three Anopheles mosquito species in East Africa that are responsible for the majority of malaria transmission, posing a significant public health concern. Understanding the vector competence of different mosquito species is crucial for targeted and cost-effective malaria control strategies. This study investigated the vector competence of laboratory reared strains of East African An. gambiae sensu stricto, An. funestus s.s., and An. arabiensis mosquitoes towards local isolates of Plasmodium falciparum infection. Mosquito feeding assays using gametocytaemic blood from local donors revealed significant differences in both prevalence and intensity of oocyst and sporozoite infections among the three vectors. An. funestus mosquitoes presented the highest sporozoite prevalence 23.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.5–29.6) and intensity of infection 6-58138 sporozoites. Relative to An. funestus, the odds ratio for sporozoites prevalence were 0.46 (95% CI 0.25–0.85) in An. gambiae and 0.19 (95% CI 0.07–0.51) in An. arabiensis, while the incidence rate ratio for sporozoite intensity was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14–0.69) in An. gambiae and 0.66 (95% CI 0.16–2.60) in An. arabiensis. Our findings indicate that all three malaria vector species may contribute to malaria transmission in East Africa, with An. funestus demonstrating superior vector competence. In conclusion, there is a need for comprehensive malaria control strategies targeting major malaria vector species, an update of malaria transmission models to consider vector competence and evaluation of malaria transmission blocking interventions in assays that include An. funestus mosquitoes.