Browsing by Author "Mappi, Tauta"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Field vaccination of locally-owned cattle against malignant catarrhal fever under environmentally challenging conditions in Tanzania
(Elsevier, 2025-01-25) Bainbridge, Samuel; Mappi, Tauta; Cleaveland, Sarah; Chubwa, Choby; Davis, Alicia; Grant, Dawn; Kibona, Tito; Bwatota, Shedrack; Larsen, Freja; Lyimo, Samson; Mshana, Fadhili; Percival, Ann; Shirima, Gabriel; Mtili, Bakari; Musyangi, Felix; Tarimo, Rigobert; Lankester, Felix; Russell, George
Malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), caused by alcelaphine herpesvirus-1 (AIHV-1) transmitted from wildebeest, is a lethal cattle disease with significant impacts on East African pastoralists. Development of a live attenuated MCF vaccine has prompted research into its use in communities at risk. This study reports results from the first utilisation of the MCF vaccine in locally-owned cattle under field conditions. The study involved a primary two-dose course vaccination of 1634 cattle, followed a year later, by boost vaccination of 385 of these cattle. It aimed to: (a) evaluate the antibody response to a two-dose AlHV-1 primary vaccination course, including initial response, antibody levels after one year, and clinical events post-vaccination; (b) assess how factors like age, reproductive status, body condition, and breed influence the initial response; and (c) compare antibody responses to single- and two-dose booster protocols one year after primary vaccination. Analyses were carried out using linear mixed-effects models and paired t-tests. Clinical incidents were reported in 11/1634 cattle vaccinated during the primary course and in 0/385 cattle during the boost regimens. The primary vaccination resulted in a 9-fold increase in comparison to pre-vaccination antibody levels and the response was consistent across animals of different ages, reproductive statuses and body conditions. While antibody levels declined 11 months after primary vaccination, they remained high, and a single-dose booster vaccination was sufficient to elicit a strong immune response, with only marginal increases after a second booster. The study provides evidence of high immunogenicity and low incidences of clinical events of the vaccine in cattle across individual host factors and immunologically vulnerable groups, under prevailing environmental conditions. It also indicates the utility of a single-dose booster regimen. These findings will support progress towards commercial production and larger-scale adoption which could generate important benefits for the livelihoods, and sustainability of pastoral livestock systems.
“He Who Relies on His Brother's Property Dies Poor”: The Complex Narratives of Livestock Care in Northern Tanzania
(Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2021-11-03) Davis, Alicia; Virhia, Jennika; Buza, Joram; Crump, John; de Glanville, William; Halliday, Jo; Lankester, Felix; Mappi, Tauta; Mnzava, Kunda; Swai, Emanuel; Thomas, Kate; Toima, Mamus; Cleaveland, Sarah; Mmbaga, Blandina; Sharp, Jo
Background: Endemic zoonoses have important impacts for livestock-dependent households in East Africa. In these communities, people's health and livelihoods are severely affected by livestock disease losses. Understanding how livestock keepers undertake remedial actions for livestock illness has the potential for widespread benefits such as improving health interventions. Yet, studies about livestock and human health behaviours in the global south tend to focus on individual health choices. In reality, health behaviours are complex, and not solely about individualised health experiences. Rather, they are mediated by a range of “upstream” factors (such as unequal provision of services), which are beyond the control of the individual. Methods: This paper presents qualitative research conducted from 2014 to 2019 for a study focused on the Social, Economic, and Environmental Drivers of Zoonoses in Tanzania (SEEDZ). Qualitative data were collected via focus group discussions, community meetings, informal interviews, formal in-depth interviews, observations and surveys that addressed issues of health, disease, zoonotic disease risks, and routes for treatment across 21 villages. Thematic analysis was carried out on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. Conceptual analyses and observations were made through application of social science theories of health. Findings: Livestock keepers undertake a range of health seeking strategies loosely categorised around self and formal treatment. Two key themes emerged that are central to why people make the decisions they do: access to resources and trust in health care providers. These two issues affect individual sense of agency which impacts their ability to act to improve livestock health outcomes. We suggest that individual choice and agency in veterinary health seeking decisions are only beneficial if health systems can offer adequate care and health equity is addressed. Significance: This study demonstrates the value of in-depth qualitative research which reveals the nuance and complexity of people's decisions around livestock health. Most importantly, it explains why “better” knowledge does not always translate into “better” practise. The paper suggests that acknowledging and addressing these aspects of veterinary health seeking will lead to more effective provision.