Browsing by Author "Hofer, Lorenz"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

A household randomized-control trial of insecticide-treated screening for malaria control in unimproved houses in Tanzania
(Springer Nature, 2025-06-08) Odufuwa, Olukayode; Moore, Sarah Jane; Mboma, Zawadi; Mwanga, Rehema; Matwewe, Fatuma; Hofer, Lorenz; Moore, Jason; Nguyen, Hien; Bosselmann, Rune; Skovmand, Ole; Stevenson,Jennifer; Muganga, Joseph; Bradley, John
Background Installing insecticidal netting on open eaves, windows, and holes in walls of unimproved houses is a potential malaria control tool. It prevents mosquito house-entry, induces lethal and sub-lethal effects on malaria vectors, and may reduce malaria transmission. Therefore, a household epidemiological trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of insecticide- treated screening (ITS) on malaria infection and indoor vectors in Tanzania. Methods In Chalinze district, Tanzania, 421 households were randomized into two arms. In June-July 2021, one group of households’ houses was fitted with ITS (incorporated with deltamethrin and piperonyl butoxide) on eaves, windows, and wall holes, while the second group did not receive screening. After installation, consenting household members (aged ≥ 6 months) were tested for malaria infection using quantitative polymerase chain reaction after the long rainy season (June/July 2022, primary outcome) and the short rainy season (January/February 2022, secondary outcome). Secondary outcomes included indoor total mosquito per trap/night (June–July 2022), adverse effects after one month of ITS installation (August 2021), and chemical bioavailability and retention of ITS samples after one year of field use (June/July 2022). At the end of the trial, the control group received ITS. Results Malaria prevalence among residents in the ITS arm was 19.9% (50/251) and 28.3% (65/230) in the control arm after the long rains, however, this difference was not significant [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (95% CI 0.35–1.28), p = 0.227]. Similarly, no protection was seen for ITS after the short rains, [OR 1.27 (95% CI 0.68–2.38), p = 0.452]. However, school-age children in the ITS arm had lower malaria after the long rains [OR 0.11 (95% CI 0.02–0.73), p = 0.022]. No serious adverse effects were reported. The mean number of female Anopheles mosquitoes caught per trap/night was not significantly different between arms [1.7 vs 2.4, crude relative risk: 0.71 (95% CI 0.16–3.09), p = 0.650]. ITS showed reduced chemical bioavailability and retention post-field use. The trial reported high household refusals (17–30%) in both arms in both surveys. Conclusion The trial was inconclusive because households’ refusal resulted in low power. A large cluster randomized trial of the intervention, preferably with screens treated with longer-lasting insecticides installed in houses, is needed. Trial registry: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05125133) on October 2021 Keywords Insecticide-treated screening, ITS, Insecticide-treated nets, ITNs, Eave nets, Malaria prevalence, Mosquitoes, Trial, House modification, Tanzania
DENV-2 Circulation and Host Preference Among Highly Anthropophilic, Outdoor-Biting Aedes aegypti in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
(MDPI, 2025-06-05) Tenywa, Frank; Hälg, Silvan; Makame, Haji; Moore, Jason; Dogan, Osward; Mapipi, Harubu; Machange, Jane; Lilolime, Nasoro; Hofer, Lorenz; Batao, Lewis; Mwamlima, Tunu; Müller, Pie; Moore, Sarah
In Tanzania, dengue outbreaks have occurred almost annually over the past decade, with each new outbreak becoming more severe. This study investigated the preva- lence of dengue virus (DENV) serotypes in the wild Aedes aegypti and their blood sources to determine human exposure risk in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A two-year longitudinal survey was conducted in the Ilala, Kinondoni, and Temeke districts of Dar es Salaam to sample Ae. aegypti mosquitoes using Biogents Sentinel trap (BGS), Prokopack aspira- tion, and Gravid Aedes trap (GAT). Collected mosquitoes were pooled in groups of 10 and tested for DENV1–4 serotypes using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Blood meal sources were identified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Of 854 tested pools, only DENV-2 was detected and was found in all three districts: Temeke (3/371 pools), Ilala (1/206 pools), and Kinondoni (1/277 pools). Blood meal analysis showed a strong preference for humans (81%) as well as for mixed blood meals that contained human blood and other hosts (17%). Out of 354 collected hosts seeking Ae. aegypti, 78.5% were captured outdoors and 21.5% indoors. This study confirms the circulation of DENV-2 in Ae. aegypti populations, indicating a potential dengue outbreak risk in Tanzania. This study also demonstrates that xenomonitoring may be feasible in this setting. The mosquitoes’ strong preference for human hosts and predominance in outdoor settings pose challenges for dengue control effort
Modified World Health Organization (WHO) Tunnel Test for Higher Throughput Evaluation of Insecticide-Treated Nets (ITNs) Considering the Effect of Alternative Hosts, Exposure Time, and Mosquito Density
(MDPI, 2022-06-21) Kamande, Dismas; Odufuwa, Olukayode; Mbuba, Emmanuel; Hofer, Lorenz; Moore, Sarah
The standard World Health Organization (WHO) tunnel test is a reliable laboratory bioassay used for “free-flying” testing of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) bio-efficacy where mosquitoes pass through a ITN sample to reach a live animal bait. Multiple parameters (i.e., bait, exposure time, and mosquito density) may affect the outcomes measured in tunnel tests. Therefore, a comparison was conducted of alternative hosts, exposure time, and lower mosquito density against the current gold standard test (100 mosquitoes, animal bait, and 12-h exposure) as outlined in the WHO ITN evaluation guideline. This was done with the aim to make the tunnel test cheaper and with higher throughput to meet the large sample sizes needed for bio-efficacy durability monitoring of chlorfenapyr ITNs that must be evaluated in “free-flying” bioassays. Methods: A series of experiments were conducted in the WHO tunnel test to evaluate the impact of the following factors on bio-efficacy endpoints of mosquito mortality at 24-h (M24) and 72-h (M72) and blood-feeding success (BFS): (1) baits (rabbit, membrane, human arm); (2) exposure time in the tunnel (1 h vs. 12 h); and (3) mosquito density (50 vs. 100). Finally, an alternative bioassay using a membrane with 50 mosquitoes (membrane-50) was compared to the gold standard bioassay (rabbit with 100 mosquitoes, rabbit-100). Pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis and pyrethroid susceptible Anopheles gambiae were used to evaluate Interceptor® and Interceptor® G2 ITNs. Results: Using a human arm as bait gave a very different BFS, which impacted measurements of M24 and M72. The same trends in M24, M72 and BFS were observed for both Interceptor® ITN and Interceptor® G2 unwashed and washed 20 times measured using the gold standard WHO tunnel test (rabbit-100) or rabbit with 50 mosquitoes (rabbit-50). M24, M72 and BFS were not statistically different when either 50 or 100 mosquitoes were used with rabbit bait in the tunnel bioassay for either the susceptible or resistant strains. No systematic difference was observed between rabbit-50 and rabbit-100 in the agreement by the Bland and Altman method (B&A). The mean difference was 4.54% (−22.54–31.62) in BFS and 1.71% (−28.71–32.12) in M72 for rabbit-50 versus rabbit-100. Similar M24, M72 and lower BFS was measured by membrane-50 compared to rabbit-100. No systematic difference was observed in the agreement between membrane-50 and rabbit-100, by B&A. The mean difference was 9.06% (−11.42–29.64) for BSF and −5.44% (−50.3–39.45) for M72. Both membrane-50, rabbit-50 and rabbit-100 predicted the superiority of Interceptor® G2 over Interceptor® ITN for the resistant strain on M72. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that WHO tunnel tests using rabbit bait may be run with 50 mosquitoes to increase sample sizes needed for bio-efficacy durability monitoring of ITNs in “free-flying” bioassays. Using a membrane feeder with 50 mosquitoes is a potential replacement for the WHO tunnel bioassay with animal bait if control blood feeding rates can be improved to 50% because blood feeding impacts mosquito survival after exposure to insecticides.