• English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Have you forgotten your password?
    Research Collection
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Have you forgotten your password?
NM-AIST Repository
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Coe, Richard"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Qualitative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Pesticidal Plants in Smallholder Crop Protection
    (MDPI, 2021-10-15) Mkindi, Angela; Coe, Richard; Stevenson, Philip; Ndakidemi, Patrick; Belmain, Steven
    Assessing the potential drivers of farmers using pesticidal plants for crop protection is essential for wider adoption. However, few studies have focused on collaborative assessments of the underlying trade-offs when using pesticidal plant extracts for pest control. Smallholder farmers in northern Tanzania involved in farmer driven research assessing pesticidal plants evaluated the costs, benefits, trade-offs and areas for future investment. A questionnaire was used to collect demographic information from 77 farmers and their views on pest problems and crop protection in common bean production. This was followed by small focus group discussions (n = 9) using a participatory framework to elucidate the costs and benefits of adopting pesticidal plant technology. A multiple correspondence analysis showed that pesticidal plant use was associated with men greater than 50 years old, and synthetic pesticide use was associated with younger aged farmers and women. Farmers who used synthetics generally did not report the presence of common pest species found in common bean production, whereas farmers who used pesticidal plants were associated with more frequent reports of pest species. This participatory cost–benefit analysis highlighted that tools and processing challenges were the main costs to using pesticidal plants. The main benefit reported when using pesticidal plants was a general improvement to family health. Farmers expressed overall a positive outcome when using pesticidal plants for crop protection and recommended that future investments focus on improving access to tools and education regarding plant processing and extraction to improve uptake of the technology by smallholder farmers.
Other Links
  • Tanzania Research Repository
  • CERN Document Server
  • Confederation of Open Access Repositories
  • Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB)
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
useful resources
  • Emerald Database
  • Taylor & Francis
  • EBSCO Host
  • Research4Life
  • Elsevier Journal
Contact us
  • library@nm-aist.ac.tz
  • The Nelson Mandela African institution of science and Technology, 404 Nganana, 2331 Kikwe, Arumeru P.O.BOX 447, Arusha

Nelson Mandela - AIST | Copyright © 2025

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback