• English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
    Research Collection
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
NM-AIST Repository
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Chrisogoni, Paschal"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Application of sustainability indicators for the evaluation and selection of robust organic-rich wastewater treatment technology for resource recovery
    (AIMS Press, 2024-10-29) Chrisogoni, Paschal; Rwiza, Mwemezi; Njau, Karoli
    A comparative study was conducted to compare the performance of waste stabilization ponds (WSPs) with an upflow operation type advanced facultative pond integrated with constructed wetland (AFP-CW) technologies. Our aim was to address gaps in economic, environmental, and social aspects identified in traditional WSPs. Economic, environmental, and social sustainability indicators were used in a mathematical model to select a sustainable technology for organic-rich wastewater treatment for resource recovery. The results showed that for the AFP-CW, economic, environmental, and social indicators were weighted at 10.18%, 51.11%, and 38.71%, respectively, while for WSPs, the percentages were 14.55, 48.39, and 37.06, respectively. The composite sustainability indicator (CSI) for AFP-CW was 42.14% and for WSPs was 39.27%, with the global sustainability indicator (GSi) reaching 21.54% for AFP-CW and 18.88% for WSPs. A sensitivity analysis revealed that the maximum global sustainability indicator was 22.34% for AFP-CW and 19.54% for WSPs. Overall, the AFP-CW was considered a more sustainable technology for wastewater treatment, with lower economic but higher environmental and social sustainability indicators compared to WSPs, which showed higher economic but lower environmental and social sustainability indicators. The sustainability of AFP-CW is supported by its small construction area, nutrient recovery in sludge, biogas recovery, reduced global warming impact, as well as nutrient and water recycling for irrigation.
Other Links
  • Tanzania Research Repository
  • CERN Document Server
  • Confederation of Open Access Repositories
  • Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB)
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
useful resources
  • Emerald Database
  • Taylor & Francis
  • EBSCO Host
  • Research4Life
  • Elsevier Journal
Contact us
  • library@nm-aist.ac.tz
  • The Nelson Mandela African institution of science and Technology, 404 Nganana, 2331 Kikwe, Arumeru P.O.BOX 447, Arusha

Nelson Mandela - AIST | Copyright © 2025

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback