xmlui.dri2xhtml.structural.head-subtitle

Occurrence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotypes in Uganda and Tanzania (2003 to 2015): A Review and Implications for Prospective Regional Disease Control

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kerfua, Susan D.
dc.contributor.author Dhikusooka, Moses T.
dc.contributor.author Mulondo, Alice L.
dc.contributor.author Bugeza, James
dc.contributor.author Kabi, Fredrick
dc.contributor.author Shirima, Gabriel M.
dc.contributor.author Kusiluka, Lughano J.M.
dc.contributor.author Ayebazibwe, Chrisostom
dc.contributor.author Cleaveland, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Haydon, Daniel T.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-12T08:29:13Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-12T08:29:13Z
dc.date.issued 2020-05-15
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n6p119
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/123456789/791
dc.description This research article published by the Journal of Agricultural Science, 2020 en_US
dc.description.abstract Endemic foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) presents a global economic challenge to the livestock industry. The progressive control pathway for FMD (PCP-FMD) specifies successive steps through which a country/region can reduce FMD virus circulation and impact. These steps are reliant on understanding and obtaining knowledge on FMD epidemiology, to inform development of appropriate disease interventions like vaccination and quarantine programs. Currently, Uganda and Tanzania are in the early stages of the PCP-FMD. This review was undertaken to determine FMDV serotype distribution in Uganda and Tanzania between 2003 and 2015. The paper also presents the vaccine strains used in both countries for the same period viz avis the circulating topotypes. The review highlights four (O, A, SAT 1 and SAT 2) and five (O, A, SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3) serotypes that occurred in Uganda and Tanzania respectively in the thirteen year period. Observations revealed that reported circulating serotypes O and A in the two countries belonged to similar topotypes, East African 2 (EA-2) and AFRICA respectively. The SAT 1 viruses in Tanzania belonged to topotype I and differed from the Ugandan SAT 1s that belonged to topotype IV. Similarly, the SAT 2s in both countries belonged to different topotypes: IV in Tanzania and I in Uganda. This review additionally, underscores the spatial distribution of FMDV serotypes in Uganda and Tanzania and highlights regions in both countries that had high serotype diversity. The paper recommends definitive disease diagnoses, molecular serotype characterisation and matched vaccination deployment for improved disease control. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Agricultural Science en_US
dc.subject Foot-and-mouth disease en_US
dc.title Occurrence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotypes in Uganda and Tanzania (2003 to 2015): A Review and Implications for Prospective Regional Disease Control en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Our NM-AIST IR


Browse NM-AIST IR

My NM-AIST IR Account

Statistics