xmlui.dri2xhtml.structural.head-subtitle

Application of Multiple Unsupervised Models to Validate Clusters Robustness in Characterizing Smallholder Dairy Farmers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nyambo, Devotha G.
dc.contributor.author Luhanga, Edith T.
dc.contributor.author Yonah, Zaipuna O.
dc.contributor.author Mujibi, Fidalis D. N.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-22T06:13:29Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-22T06:13:29Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01-02
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1020521
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/123456789/130
dc.description Research Article published by Hindawi The Scientific World Journal en_US
dc.description.abstract The heterogeneity of smallholder dairy production systems complicates service provision, information sharing, and dissemination of new technologies, especially those needed to maximize productivity and profitability. In order to obtain homogenous groups within which interventions can bemade, it is necessary to define clusters of farmers who undertake similar management activities. This paper explores robustness of production cluster definition using various unsupervised learning algorithms to assess the best approach to define clusters. Data were collected from 8179 smallholder dairy farms in Ethiopia and Tanzania. From a total of 500 variables, selection of the 35 variables used in defining production clusters and household membership to these clusters was determined by Principal Component Analysis and domain expert knowledge. Three clustering algorithms, K-means, fuzzy, and Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), were compared in terms of their grouping consistency and prediction accuracy. The model with the least household reallocation between clusters for training and testing data was deemed the most robust. Prediction accuracy was obtained by fitting a model with fixed effects model including production clusters on milk yield, sales, and choice of breeding method. Results indicated that, for the Ethiopian dataset, clusters derived fromthe fuzzy algorithm had the highest predictive power (77% for milk yield and 48% for milk sales), while for the Tanzania data, clusters derived from Self-Organizing Maps were the best performing.The average cluster membership reallocation was 15%, 12%, and 34% for K-means, SOM, and fuzzy, respectively, for households in Ethiopia. Based on the divergent performance of the various algorithms evaluated, it is evident that, despite similar information being available for the study populations, the uniqueness of the data fromeach country provided an over-riding influence on cluster robustness and prediction accuracy.The results obtained in this study demonstrate the difficulty of generalizing model application and use across countries and production systems, despite seemingly similar information being collected. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Hindawi The Scientific World Journal en_US
dc.subject Research Subject Categories en_US
dc.title Application of Multiple Unsupervised Models to Validate Clusters Robustness in Characterizing Smallholder Dairy Farmers en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Our NM-AIST IR


Browse NM-AIST IR

My NM-AIST IR Account

Statistics