• Login
    View Item 
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Common predators and factors influencing their abundance in Anopheles funestus aquatic habitats in rural south-eastern Tanzania

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (1.550Mb)
    Date
    2023-06-26
    Author
    Mahenge, Herieth
    Muyaga, Letus
    Nkya, Joel
    Kifungo, Khamis
    Kahamba, Najat
    Ngowo, Halfan
    Kaindoa, Emmanuel
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background The role of larval predators in regulating the Anopheles funestus population in various malaria-endemic countries remains relatively unknown. This study aimed to investigate the common predators that co-exist with Anopheles funestus group larvae and evaluate factors that influence their abundance in rural south-eastern Tanzania. Methods Mosquito larvae and predators were sampled concurrently using standard dipper (350 ml) or 10 L bucket in previously identified aquatic habitats in selected villages in southern Tan zania. Predators and mosquito larvae were identified using standard identification keys. All positive habitats were geo-located and their physical features characterized. Water physico chemical parameters such as dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS) and temperature were also recorded. Results A total of 85 previously identified An. funestus aquatic habitats in nine villages were sampled for larvae and potential predators. A total of 8,295 predators were sampled. Of these Coena grionidae 57.7% (n = 4785), Corixidae 12.8% (n = 1,060), Notonectidae 9.9% (n = 822), Aeshnidae 4.9% (n = 405), Amphibian 4.5% (n = 370), Dytiscidae 3.8% (n = 313) were com mon. A total of 5,260 mosquito larvae were sampled, whereby Anopheles funestus group were 60.3% (n = 3,170), Culex spp. 24.3% (n = 1,279), An. gambie s.l. 8.3% (n = 438) and other anophelines 7.1% (n = 373). Permanent and aquatic habitats larger than 100m2 were positively associated with An. funestus group larvae (P<0.05) and predator abundance(P<0.05). Habitats with submerged vegetation were negatively associated with An. funestus group larvae (P<0.05). Only dissolved oxygen (DO) was positively and significantly affect the abundance of An. funestus group larvae (P<0.05). While predators’ abundance was not impacted by all physicochemical parameters. Conclusion Six potential predator families were common in aquatic habitats of An. funestus group lar vae. Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of different predators on lar val density and adult fitness traits. Interventions leveraging the interaction between mosquitoes and predators can be established to disrupt the transmission potential and sur vival of the An. funestus mosquitoes
    URI
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287655
    https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2420
    Collections
    • Research Articles [LISBE]

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV