• Login
    View Item 
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    •   NM-AIST Home
    • Life sciences and Bio-engineering
    • Research Articles [LISBE]
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effects of Restoration Techniques on Plant Diversity and Forage Biomass in Areas Invaded by Prosopis juliflora

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (345.3Kb)
    Date
    2021-12
    Author
    Jumanne, Yohana
    Moyo, Francis
    Mbwambo, John
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Prosopis juliflora, an invasive plant worldwide causes major threats by destructing natural ecosystem and limits provisioning of ecosystem services in the invaded areas. Attempts to manage the species and restore invaded lands have landed countries to adopt and implement different restoration options.This study tested three restoration options namely Diveting, Mulching and Seeding and their combination to assess their effectiveness in enhancing plant diversity and forage biomass. The study cleared invaded lands in Kahe Ward, Northern Tanzania and laid two blocks, each designated to address livestock pasture and conservationchallenges. Experimental blocks were laid in a complete randomized design in 10mx10m plots.Data on plant species and forage biomass were collected in each 10mx10m whereby plants were identified with the support of a botanist; their number recorded, and grass samples green and dry weight determined. The Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index was used to estimate diversity of plant species and the average values in each restoration treatment.One way ANOVA showed that, diversity of native plants was higher in control (Mean±SE =1.239±0.937)than diveting (Mean±SE =1.105±0.56) and diveting-mulching (Mean±SE =0.7703±0.55). Forage biomass was higher in control (Mean±SE =65.917±10.083)than in diveting(Mean±SE =52.425±11.15), diverting-mulching(Mean±SE =42.067±8.751) and diveting-seeding-mulching (Mean±SE =57.625±10.02)implying that restoration interventions have no positive influence on forage biomass.It is recommended that, clearing the land and leave it without restoration is enough because the restoration options do not have positive influence on plant diversity and forage biomass
    URI
    http://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2021.34101
    https://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/2284
    Collections
    • Research Articles [LISBE]

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All PublicationsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Nelson Mandela-AIST copyright © 2021  DuraSpace
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV