Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalamsha, Augustine
dc.contributor.authorDida, Mussa
dc.contributor.authorMoebs, Sabine
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-11T08:41:26Z
dc.date.available2023-09-11T08:41:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi: 10.20944/preprints202308.1395.v1
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/1950
dc.descriptionThis research article was published by Preprints (www.preprints.org) 2023en_US
dc.description.abstractThe problem of low soil fertility and limited research in agricultural data driven tools, may lead to low crop productivity which makes it imperative to research in applications of high throughput computational algorithms such as of machine learning (ML) for effective soil analysis and fertility status prediction in order to assist in optimal soil fertility management decision-making activities. However, difficulties in the choice of the key soil properties parameters for use in reliable soil nutrients analysis and fertility prediction. Also, individual ML algorithms setbacks and modelling expert implementation procedures subjectivity, may lead to exploitation of worst fertility level targets and soil fertility status targets classification models performance reported variations. This paper surveys state-of-affair in ML for agricultural soil nutrients analysis and fertility status prediction. Prominent soil properties and widely used classical modelling algorithms and procedures are identified. Empirically exploited fertility status target classes are scrutinized, and reported soil fertility prediction model performances are depicted. The three pass method, with mixed method of qualitative content analysis and qualitative simple descriptive statistics were used in this survey. Observably, the frequently used soil nutrients and chemical properties were organic carbon, phosphorus, potassium, and potential Hydrogen, followed by iron, manganese, copper and zinc. Predominant algorithms included Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes, followed by Support Vector Machine. Model performances varied, with highest accuracy 98.93% and 98.15% achieved by ensemble methods, and the least being 60%. Interdisciplinary ML related researchers may consider using ensemble methods to develop high performance soil fertility status prediction models.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPreprints (www.preprints.org)en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectsoil nutrients analysisen_US
dc.subjectSmart soil fertility managementen_US
dc.titleA Survey of Machine Learning Modelling for Agricultural Soil Properties Analysis and Fertility Status Predictionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record