Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaul, Lucas
dc.contributor.authorDeogratias, Geradius
dc.contributor.authorShadrack, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMudogo, Celestin
dc.contributor.authorMtei, Kelvin
dc.contributor.authorMachunda, Revocatus
dc.contributor.authorPaluch, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorNtie‐Kang, Fidele
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T14:16:42Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02T14:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020352
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/1424
dc.descriptionThis research article published by MDPI, 2022en_US
dc.description.abstractLinamarin has been reported to have anticancer activities; however, its extraction and isolation using different solvents yield a low amount. Therefore, understanding the physical prop‐ erties, such as solvents’ solubility, membrane permeability and lipophilicity and how they are asso‐ ciated with different solvents, is a paramount topic for discussion, especially for its potential as a drug. Linamarin has a sugar moiety with many polar groups responsible for its physical properties. Following current trends, a molecular dynamics simulation is performed to investigate its physical properties and how different solvents, such as water, methanol (MeOH), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dichloromethane (DCM), affect such properties. In this work, we have investigated the influence of intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding and the influence of polar and non‐polar solvents on the physical properties of linamarin. Furthermore, solvation free‐energy and electronic structure analysis are performed. The structural analysis results show that the polar groups of linamarin have strong interactions with all solvents except the etheric oxygen groups. A detailed analysis shows intermolecular hydrogen bonding between polar solvents (water, MeOH and DMSO) and the hydroxyl oxygens of linamarin. Water exhibits the strongest interaction with linamarin’s functional groups among the investigated solvents. The findings show that within the first solvation shell, the number of water molecules is greatest, while MeOH has the fewest. Cen‐ trally to the structural analysis, solvation free energy confirms DMSO to be the best solvent since it prefers to interact with linamarin over itself, while water prefers to interact with itself. While the solute–solvent interactions are strongest between linamarin and water, the solvent–solvent interac‐ tions are strongest in water. As a result, the solvation free‐energy calculations reveal that linamarin solvation is most favourable in DMSO.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectMolecular dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectHydrogen bondingen_US
dc.subjectSolvation free energyen_US
dc.titleA Molecular Investigation of the Solvent Influence on Inter- and Intra-Molecular Hydrogen Bond Interaction of Linamarinen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record